Noise to Signal

Login disabled.

Doctor Who - The Girl in the Fireplace

The Doctor and Madame de Pompadour

I was getting worried there, for a minute. Doctor Who was beginning to feel like a bit of a letdown; what was going on? New Earth was good, but had some serious internal logic problems (zombies taking a shower in an intravenous solution brings about the next stage of human evolution?), Tooth and Claw was enjoyable but had a slightly patchy script, and School Reunion was entertaining but under-developed and left too many unanswered questions to be truly satisfying.

That’s all changed, though. Who is back!

The one and only Steven Moffat penned The Girl in the Fireplace. Moffat, currently nominated for a Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form for last year’s The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances (counted as one episode on the ballot), seems to be an author fascinated by history. Instead of World War II, however, he now takes us on a journey to the 18th century, where the Doctor meets a little girl by the name of Jeanne-Antoinette Poisson, soon to be known as Madame de Pompadour.

The episode kicks off in style, with a lovely picturesque 18th century French home being harassed by some unknown force. Even though the music sounds a bit like Monkey Island, it's a very effective opening. Then the TARDIS arrives 3000 years later on an abandoned spaceship. I quite like the feel of this ship - it reminds me a bit of Allen Steele's Hugo-winning novella, "The Death of Captain Future" (1995). The plots of The Girl in the Fireplace and "The Death of Captain Future" are completely different, but the atmosphere of unnatural desertion is strong in both works.

The basic storyline of The Girl in the Fireplace - a living ship searching for repair parts - is not entirely unfamiliar to long-term SF fans, but Moffat is good enough at what he does to take that concept and make it his own. Moffat embraces the fact that Doctor Who thrives on a sense of fun, and not necessarily on strict logical sense, and really makes the most of it. For example: despite the fact that the Doctor uses a rotating fireplace to travel to 18th century France, and despite the fact that he quite literally encounters a monster-under-the-bed - despite this, Moffat still manages to scare the pants off of us with what is, in essence, a cheap trick of every horror movie.

Second Opinion

As someone who was head-over-heels in love with the first series, it's pained me slightly that something has continued to feel slightly off about series two, despite its steady improvement. Thank Christ, then, for Steven Moffat's episode coming so early in the series and blowing all of that out of the water. This was sheer, unadulterated, joyously wonderful stuff.

It hit the ground running, too. Barely ten minutes in, and wham! - a moment that will give children (and many adults) across the land nightmares. To be fair, the episode wasn't particularly scary after the initial shock of the masked robot reveal, but it didn't need to be - we were hooked by the initial shock, one that played on our eternal childhood fears of there being something lurking under our beds.

What Moffat really gets, though, is that modern-era Doctor Who is at its best when it's funny, scary and moving in equal measures, and The Girl in the Fireplace threw together this balance in such a way as to make almost every other episode of the RTD era (save for his own Empty Child, and perhaps The Parting of the Ways, which was brilliant for completely different reasons) look painfully ordinary.

The laughs were genuine, with an array of endlessly-quotable lines to stack alongside previous Moffat gems. The pathos, too, was heartfelt rather than schmaltzy - enough was done with Jeanne-Antoinette as a character that we genuinely felt for her, being unable to realise her dream of seeing the stars, rather than simply feeling for the Doctor and his loss (which, of course, we also did). Plenty of that was to do with Sophia Myles' portrayal, an excellent guest turn dripping with class and no small amount of chemistry with you-know-who. Who, by the way, it's difficult to say anything new about - he simply continues to dazzle, extending his range and making this Doctor very firmly his own. The plotting was tight, with the reveal at the end beautifully handled, and the episode was simply littered with terrific ideas and touches - it's not hard to see why the Doctor fell "in love" with the machinery of the clockwork robots, who were as well-realised as they were well-conceived, while every appearance or mention of the horse was simply the icing on the cake.

If there's anything I have a quibble about, it was the apparent readiness of the Doctor to leave Rose and Mickey stranded on a spaceship with no hope of escape. It's certainly not something the Ninth Doctor would have done, and while it's in keeping with the more impulsive nature of the Tenth, I'm left wondering if it's something they're going to address in later episodes, because it did leave a slightly bitter taste on what was otherwise a near-perfect forty-five minutes of television. Still, though, this is why we love it so much - because when it's on form like this, nothing else can touch it.

So, what about the rest of the episode? Well, the Doctor outwits a six-foot clock, and returns to find Madame de Pompadour as a young woman, who, despite her aristocratic upbringing (or more probably because of it), relishes the sense of danger and recklessness that emanates from the Doctor. Enough to plant one on him right after he shows up the second time. She's not one to waste any time, is she? Even so, at this point in the episode, it's a complete mystery why she has been singled out by the ship, or what exactly the ship is trying to do.

Any good literary critic will tell you that certain themes come up time and again in an artist's work. As Lucius Shepard once wrote, "Writing fiction is like taking a rubbing of your brain. All the bulges and convolutions and fissures will show up in your work whether you want them to or not." In Moffat's case, one of those themes seems to be masks. He used them to excellent effect in The Empty Child, and The Girl in the Fireplace uses them again.

The next time we encounter one of the masked clocks, it's a major step forward in terms of plot. We find out that they are programmed to obey Madame de Pompadour and, more importantly, what exactly happened to all the crewmembers. This is where the episode really gets interesting. The ship is merely executing repairs, not out for revenge or something equally silly. This idea struck me as being reminiscent of several different SF works. Perhaps the most notable work that came to mind is James Patrick Kelly's superb 1990 novella, "Mr. Boy," where Mr. Boy's mother has genetic surgery to transform herself into a two-story house in the shape of the Statue of Liberty, and uses aspects of her personality channeled through robots in an attempt to continue living after death. This ship, however, does not have the maternal sense that "Mr. Boy" had, but instead thinks in terms of necessity: The ship needs to repair itself in order to function, and it will do everything possible to repair itself. It's not a question of murder or humanity. It is reminiscent of the type of thinking that the dinos had to teach Michael Burr in Kelly's "Think Like a Dinosaur" (1995) - it doesn't matter that they're human, what matters is balancing the equation.

Anyway, back to the episode. Rose and Mickey are captured by the repair droids, the Doctor reads Madame de Pompadour's mind (and she is somehow able to enter the Doctor's mind as well), and the repair droids find the correct time window. They attempt to take her brain by force, the Doctor saves the day and inevitably becomes trapped in the 18th century. Madame de Pompadour had the fireplace moved to her new home, where it is exact in every detail. I'm still not sure that I buy the idea that moving a time window will leave the connection intact, as it seems too convenient - it's a bit too much of a deus ex machina to be truly believable.

I've still got a few minor quibbles with the episode. Some parts are musically over scored, the idea that these time windows had never been discovered is somewhat ludicrous (you'd think that at one point someone would bother to look behind the tapestry), the characterization of Madame de Pompadour falls flat, and as a result the chemistry between the two of them isn't quite what it should have been. (I will say, though, that the most resonant part of the episode is that she did more good for him than he did for her.) It pains me to say it, but I have to give this episode four stars. It was a near thing, though, and it's undoubtedly the best episode of the new series so far, but five stars indicates something that is absolutely perfect in every detail (or is charismatic enough in its storytelling to make you forget its faults) and unfortunately this episode left a few lingering doubts in my mind.

The SS Madame de Pompadour

But there's so much good, as well. Mickey was relatively unannoying, for one. There is some genuinely decent - though unoriginal - SF concepts, the performances were fantastic and the writing was solid throughout. The end scene revives this episode a great deal, in particular one gorgeous visual where Madame de Pompadour's body is being carried from Versailles for the last time. The very last shot, where it is revealed that the ship's name is SS Madame de Pompadour gives the episode one final resonating note; due to a corruption in the ship's files, the ship assumed that it needed Madame de Pompadour's brain in order to function properly. It was all a mistake.

But a good mistake. Through that error, someone was able to make a true connection with the Doctor - something relatively rare in this series. Despite her efforts, though, Tennant shows us through his performance in the final scene aboard the TARDIS that one lonely little boy still hasn't quite learned how to dance.

4 Stars

About this entry


Comments

Well, those first ten or so minutes were just incredible. Everything about it felt fresh and the pace was fantastic. It did eventually run out of steam a little bit towards the end and Rose has never felt more irrelevant but all in all, a very good episode. Slightly disappointed that the Doctor wasn't forced to wait 3000 years for Mickey and Rose and have him travel towards them on a spaceship at the end. Remarkably, the episode was as far as I could tell, was visually perfect. Can't wait for Cybermen. 4/5.

By Rad
May 08, 2006 @ 10:23 pm

reply / #


Another brilliant episode from the pen of Steven Moffat. David Tennant - terrific as ever, though I'd go with the 4/5 that everyone's giving it - a gnat's breadth away from complete perfection.

By si
May 08, 2006 @ 10:45 pm

reply / #


For the record, if I'd been doing the main review, I'd have given it five stars, no hesitation. But that's just me.

By Seb Patrick
May 08, 2006 @ 11:19 pm

reply / #


The first episode of this series that didn't disappoint me slightly. Absolutely wonderful.

By John Hoare
May 08, 2006 @ 11:21 pm

reply / #


Absolutely splendid stuff.

One thing was brought home to me watching it though, after eighteen (and a bit?) episodes of this, I just don't care about Rose anymore, and was just glad she got out of the way to let something else (Russell - *anything* else) happen. Even the most successful companions only had two years, and given the much faster pace of the new series, it's Croydon-time, for Billie, as far as I'm concerned. Noel Clarke continues to be brilliant though! I NEVER EVER THOUGHT I'D SAY THAT!!

By Andy M
May 08, 2006 @ 11:25 pm

reply / #


I agree completely that Rose is going nowhere. Her only contributions seem to be fucking awful 'jokes'. I reckon she'll not have a full three years, though - she'll be gone in the Christmas special, I reckon.

Florence Hoath (Nancy from The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances) for next companion, say I.

By Cappsy
May 08, 2006 @ 11:39 pm

reply / #


Eve Myles, say I.

By Seb Patrick
May 08, 2006 @ 11:48 pm

reply / #


She absolutely destroyed the "magic doooor" gag which Tennant and Clarke set up so brilliantly. Her strong-point has never been comedy, which she seemed to get away with much more easily around Eccleston - but now that comedy's more a part of Tennant's portrayal and Noel Clarke has suddenly pulled it out of the bag and nailed the character, she's just looks like she's letting the side down a bit, sadly.

Then again, Camille Coduri will be back next week to make her look good.

By Andy M
May 08, 2006 @ 11:51 pm

reply / #


"Eve Myles, say I."

Or even both. Together. In a soapy bath.

By Cappsy
May 08, 2006 @ 11:53 pm

reply / #


I love Rose - not really the character, but Billie Piper's portrayal of her. I wasn't sure at all about her at the start of the last series, but she'd won me round by the middle of the series. Her delivery of "Right, you're talking out of your..." in New Earth was fantastic, and I think she put in a great comedy performance.

Admittedly, I didn't miss her in this episode - but only because the story didn't need her. I'll be upset when Billie leaves - although I know she'd not irreplacable.

By John Hoare
May 09, 2006 @ 12:20 am

reply / #


It's funny that for most of the new series people were constantly saying 'there's too much focus on Rose!' and then we get a couple of episodes where it's less about her and people complain again!

The main problem for this season for me (so far) is the random nature of the episodes. The first third of series 1 (yes ONE) flowed really well with RTD obviously planning out properly the character moments/development with Rose and the Doctor. But things seem too confused in series 2. One minute they're being overly lovey dovey the next he's not giving a second thought to abandoning her and Mickey. It's due to lack of communication between RTD and Steven Moffat. Not that Moffat's script wasn't great, the episode ruled, but in School Reunion Rose was visibly fucked off about Mickey joining the crew but then this wasn't followed up for TGITFP.

By performingmonkey
May 09, 2006 @ 5:28 am

reply / #


Yeah, you're right on that last point about lack of communication. Moffat even admits the problem in the commentary on the Doctor Who site.

By Rad
May 09, 2006 @ 10:20 pm

reply / #


Man, Cappsy needs a girlfriend...

By Tanya Jones
May 10, 2006 @ 1:03 pm

reply / #


Man, Cappsy needs a girlfriend...

I couldn't agree more. A soapy bath wouldn't go amiss, either.

By Cappsy
May 10, 2006 @ 10:33 pm

reply / #


I wasn't very impressed with Season 2 until 'School Reunion'; I thought that was a genuinely funny episode of Who. This one ranks very highly with me too. The 'clockwork automatons' (sounds like something Dickens would say in 'The Unquiet Dead'...) were very cool and I really liked the interaction between the Doctor and Madame de Pompadour.

I sure felt like the Doctor at the end when I had to explain to my sister about the name of the ship. So it's cult sci-fi fanatics 1, devoted academic 0 :P.

By Hugo Bergmann
August 06, 2006 @ 1:54 pm

reply / #


BEST EPISODE EVER

By Michael Lacey
August 06, 2006 @ 9:32 pm

reply / #


This, The Impossible Planet and Tooth & Claw are the only episodes in series 2 that I properly enjoyed. I still don't like Doomsday as much, despite the uber-coolness of the 'Cult of Skaro' and the Billie/Tennant beach goodbye. The finale 2-parter stank as a whole IMO. Not enough action, too much Deus ex Machina. Didn't come close to Bad Wolf/TPOTW.

By performingmonkey
August 07, 2006 @ 2:14 am

reply / #


Sorry monkey, but under new regulations you have to be shot for woeful misuse of the phrase "Deus Ex Machina". Misuse of the word by people who think it means something different to what it actually means has been on a widespread increase of late, and I've had enough. Ergo, the new regulations.

Seriously. Tell me what was in any way deus ex - as opposed to having been foreshadowed - in the series finale.

By Seb
August 07, 2006 @ 10:12 am

reply / #


The resolution was just a bit too easy, I thought, like it was being thought of as it went along. Whereas with Moffat episodes all the clues littered through the story give the resolution an excellent air of things wrapping up and making sense, Doctor Who going "I'll just turn it on backwards, yeehaw! And because I was wearing these stupid fucking glasses last episode, it all makes sense! Why didn't I think of it earlier, when it's apparently been my plan all along!" at the end of Doomsday is a bit wank. I don't really know how it refers to the term "Deus Ex Machina", though, so I'll just leave that. I mean, there were lots of ace bits in Doomsday, but loads of anticlimactic bits too. War On Earth! War on a bridge and ONE ROAD. And NOBODY VISIBLY DYING. For all of about TWO MINUTES. Torchwood just turning into another base under seige within about five minutes, after the whole series setting that up. I really thought that what was in the sphere might turn out to be the POINT of the whole Torchwood thing, and then when it opened Russel T Davies just jumped out going TORCHWHAT? BORED OF THAT NOW. LOOK, DALEKS! HAHAHAH! Basically, the episodes look cool and have a powerful emotive clout with the Tylers stuff but when the impact of that is lessened on re-watching the episode, it all seems to fall apart a bit.

NB. I still give it like, an 8 out of 10 or something, I'm just being nitpicky because I sort of want Russel T Davies to go away forever.

By Michael Lacey
August 07, 2006 @ 6:12 pm

reply / #


"I sort of want Russel T Davies to go away forever."

As a writer, yes. But I'd like him to hang around as "series sculptor", or something. I think his emphases on the series as a whole are fine. It *is* important to consider where the companion is from and not to ignore the impact their disappearance will have on their family and friends. Although they've "done that", now, and they seriously need to move on. Seriously. Series 3 (sic) needs a BIG CHANGE. These first couple of series have dealt with the particular trajectory of "Rose's story" which has been very popular with the kids. Series 3 needs to be different. I'm kind of interested in whether Love & Monsters was an experiment in "other people's perspectives of a Who event" beyond just the novelty. It'd be great if the series could become so radically overhauled by the perspective of a new companion - more subtly than with L&M, obviously. A shift that's more than just having a new companion with her own background and baggage. Although I hoped we'd have a progression for series 2 after the important ground-laying of the first series and we didn't, really. It was just more of the same, and as a result it felt like things were running a little out of steam.

So maybe RTD can fuck off after all. Maybe he was only required to get the series back onto its feet, and all it'll be from now on is more of the same until someone else takes over his role. It shouldn't be too hard to find someone else who cares about Doctor Who, which is all many people have said RTD has going for him on this project.

By Geoff
August 08, 2006 @ 12:14 pm

reply / #


I think RTD has said that he'll probably stick around until the end of Series 4.

Personally, I love him. His scripts may have the odd duff note, but he's responsible for Rose, Bad Wolf, The Parting Of The Ways, Love & Monsters, Army of Ghosts, and Doomsday. He can stay as long as he likes with that track record.

Baggsy Moffatt to take over from him, though, when the time comes.

By John Hoare
August 08, 2006 @ 12:32 pm

reply / #


We just got this episode on TV in australia.. a bit late I know..atleast I think its first run.. i’d have to say I really enjoyed this episode too, to me it seems like DS9s “the visitor” or TNGs “the inner light” kind of episode in doctor who terms, all 3 of these episodes focus less on technology and more on the human side of things,

best thing ive seen short of some episodes of battlestar galactica recently
of course this warm and fuzzyness im sure will be shattered next episode as the beautiful clockwork robots get replaced by the other ones… cybermen

By Fry
February 26, 2009 @ 7:04 am

reply / #