Noise to Signal

Login disabled.

Aqua Teen Hunger Force linked to terror attacks

No, I'm not kidding.

I should just like to point out that this morning (or early afternoon, forgive me) CNN ran a "breaking news" banner regarding ten suspicious "packages" with very probable terroristic intentions in Boston.

When I got home from work (around 4 p.m. my time) the banner was changed to explain that all 10 "packages" were definitely related, but were now likely a hoax. Still no explanation otherwise.

Now it turns out that they were neither terroristic nor hoaxes...they were simply creative electronic signs to promote a television show. Alright, I'll admit, I doubt many law enforcement officers are familiar with Adult Swim's original programming, but did it really take a full day of operational paranoia (not to mention the complete closure of three main transport routes) before someone said, "Hey, wait a minute..."?

About this entry


Comments

Of course, it's rather ironic that CNN is, of course, a close brother in the corporate family tree to Cartoon Network. They're both in the Turner Broadcasting area of Time Warner.

By Rod Begbie
February 01, 2007 @ 3:57 am

reply / #


That is kind of funny and a perverse part of me wonders if that's how this was finally "revealed." Once photographs hit the AP surely somebody (SOMEBODY) at CNN would have recognized one of the show's icons...

I also like that one of the officials quoted freely admits that this was "a huge waste of money" or something to that effect. I understand it's better to be safe than sorry, but since these lighted signs weren't attached to anything explosive (or any dummy explosives, obviously) a good 10 minutes of investigation should have sufficed to prove that even if they didn't know what they were, they weren't explosives.

By Philip J Reed, VSc
February 01, 2007 @ 12:30 pm

reply / #


I still find it a bit difficult to believe that anyone could confuse an array of LEDs placed quite prominently on a building (at least in the photos I saw it was hard to miss) and arranged to look like Ignignokt and Err with their middle digits upraised with something that is likely to explode.

By Arlene Rimmer BSc, SSc
February 01, 2007 @ 12:40 pm

reply / #


By John Hoare
February 02, 2007 @ 9:59 am

reply / #


If the city pursues a civil lawsuit that would be just entirely unfair. These signs were in place for three weeks without a problem, then one day some imbecile decides it must be terrorism and shuts down the city.

Sounds to me like whoever made that call without bothered to even LOOK at the thing (a cursory glance, I remain convinced, would provide evidence enough that there were no explosive possibilities) should be the one disgraced. Not Cartoon Network.

By Philip J Reed, VSc
February 02, 2007 @ 12:52 pm

reply / #


By John Hoare
February 02, 2007 @ 4:21 pm

reply / #


It's called a knight, actually, Fry...

By Ian Symes
February 02, 2007 @ 6:03 pm

reply / #


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070209/ap_on_bi_ge/suspicious_devices

The head of the Cartoon Network resigned Friday following a marketing stunt that caused a security scare in Boston. [...] Samples said he felt "compelled to step down, effective immediately, in recognition of the gravity of the situation that occurred under my watch."

For crying out loud, it wasn't intentional...he's convinced it's his fault (or at least it sounds that way) when in reality this whole mess was due entirely to the ineptitude of whoever was called in to that scene. They failed to do cursory research and--sorry I keep saying this, but it's important--it should have been immediately evident that the devices were not explosive. City-wide shutdown was unnecessary and unjustified. Why is he acting like he was caught in a genuine act of terrorism?

By Philip J Reed, VSc
February 09, 2007 @ 10:49 pm

reply / #


You just leave Aqua Teen Hunger Force to Jack Bauer...

By Austin Ross
February 11, 2007 @ 5:41 am

reply / #


That was really funny. And here I was thinking National Lampoon was complete shit nowadays.

By Philip J Reed, VSc
February 11, 2007 @ 3:18 pm

reply / #