Noise to Signal

Login disabled.

Doctor Who - Gridlock

"He's completely mad!"

"That... and a bit magnificent!"

The Doctor and Max Normal Type Person

I tell you what, series 3 hasn’t been half bad so far has it? Ok, so before Gridlock it’s only two episodes old but everything seems to be slotting into place very nicely already. Martha is proving to be a strong character, acted brilliantly and sexily by the brilliant and sexy Freema Agamemnon, David Tennant seems to have grown bored of smug gurning and instead is showing very positive signs of completely nailing his character, and even Russell’s opening episode was brilliant! It’s like series 1 all over again with building excitement week by week, rather than the slightly empty disappointing feeling that series 2 brought all too often.

So, into episode three and we’re back to everyone’s favourite big, Welsh, Wallace look-a-like Russell T Davies. It’s always hard to judge just what his episode will be like, as they can be pure brilliance (Rose, either of his finalés, Smith & Jones), a massive load of cack that makes me want to die (Aliens of London/World War Three, New Earth) or, more commonly, flawed but ultimately passable episodes (The End of the World, The Long Game, Boom Town, Tooth and Claw, Love & Monsters). And that’s always bothered me… for the lead writer of such a brilliant show, he doesn’t have the sparkling track record that he should.

So, with that in mind – deep breath – here we are again on New Earth and in the city of New New York. It’s a location that is steeped in mediocrity, so could Russell save his new location with a storming third instalment to his Year 5 Billion trilogy? Well, it certainly had a lot going for it; it was billed a darker episode, it features the new and improved Doctor/companion dynamic, it promised the Face of Boe’s secret and Ardal O’Hanlon is a cat person! To be honest, already it’s leagues ahead of New Earth, so I expected it to be a good episode.

I didn’t, however, to be one of the very best episodes of the New Series. I tell you what, though… it bloody was.

Ok, so first let’s get the obvious stuff out of the way. The CG was incredible. This looks like it’s The Mill’s biggest episode of the year (in keeping with the tradition of the 5 Billion episodes always being the most CG heavy) and the effort put in really shows. The one restriction that’s obvious (and has been mentioned in Confidential) is the fact that all the cars look exactly the same, but that’s not a problem at all. The uniform design of the cars really adds to the effect of the traffic jam – a perfectly symmetrical block of bleakness. The Doctor’s entrance on to the motorway and his later decent through the levels is beautifully realised and contains some very impressive green screen work. TV just shouldn’t have effects as good as these.

New New York

So, Martha’s kidnapped by two car jackers with their wits about them, as before they even bother getting stuck on the motorway they know they need a third passenger to qualify for the fast lane. The only problem is that once they get to a certain point, they’re resigned to having to wait around for six years before they reach their destination on the surface... but everyone is heading for one place or another on the surface. The assumption is that if they wait long enough they’ll get there. They wont. The whole idea of being stuck in a traffic jam of years seems like a heavy handed satire on our current traffic situation, but it’s saved from clunkiness with the inclusion of some nice layers (no pun intended). The sense of community we see with the Daily Contemplation and hymn-alongs puts forward a nice message, and even stops The Doctor in his tracks for a moment. Does he really have the right to question this situation, when everyone seems perfectly happy enough all driving towards their goals together in one big group? Well, yes, he does, obviously. He’s The Doctor and he can do what he likes.

Besides, things aren’t right. These people are perpetually caught on the motorway, forever sealed in the lower levels in the last desperate act of the Senate to save as many people as possible, after a drug induced virus wipes out the planet's population. To make things worse down there, the malfunctioning extractor fans at the bottom of the motorway have allowed a certain colony to thrive and terrorise the fast lane. Macra. MACRA!

Now, their inclusion in this episode is a nice touch. A really nice touch. Firstly, and more obviously, if you want to have a race of massive crab creatures, and the original series already has a perfectly good species in canon for you to use… well, you gotta use them, haven’t you? So, exactly 40 years after their first appearance in the Troughton story The Macra Terror, the big crabby things are back. But pointless nostalgia doesn’t seem to be the driving force behind this comeback, as on closer inspection Gridlock looks more and more like one big homage.

In The Macra Terror, The Macra have taken over a human colony. Basically, the sentient crab bastards use mind control to trick the inhabitants into thinking everything in peachy, when in fact the entire colony are being used as slaves to mine precious gas for The Macra to feed on.

The Face is DEAD

Fast forward to the year 5 Billion and something or other and it seems The Macra have devolved into creatures based on pure instinct and are happy gobbling up the dirty exhaust fumes from the traffic jam. This time, though, the whole situation was brought about from mind altering drugs (or ‘moods’) which have simultaneously killed most of the planet, caused the eternal traffic jam and made damn sure that everyone in said traffic jam is doped up to their eyeballs in whatever mood they fancy - effectively keeping them all down there, asking no questions. The Macra are living off the fruits of a situation very similar to the one they created in The Macra Terror, only this time they didn’t need to manufacture it. Humankind did that for them. And that… that is why The Macra’s reappearance is a stroke of brilliance, because the whole situation is built around their entire original concept, without them having to lift a claw. Physically they certainly aren’t that significant in the episode (serving only to snap violently at cars and provide an imemdiate threat to Martha), but the themes are all present and correct, plus a hefty dollop of some quite damning comments on human nature and how it can lead to our ultimate demise without our enemies even trying.

I’ve used the word Macra far too much in this review. Macra.

So, what else? Ah, yes, Ardal O’Hanlon! The boy’s most certainly still got it, even after a number of years stagnating in My Hero. The character of Brannigan is funny, lovable and one of the best guest turns the New Series has seen. His quote at the top of this review shows one of the things I love about the character, and that was his obvious adulation of The Doctor. He was the very embodiment of the hope seen in the traffic jam and every moment with him on screen was a joy. The odd and entertaining characters didn’t stop there, as was seen by The Doctor’s decent to the lower levels through a number of cars (meeting a number of weird and wonderful people) with 2000AD’s Max Normal homage being the Doctor's last stop and highlight “I say, is that legal?; Let it never be said I’ve lost my manners”. Excellent.

For me, however, what elevated this episode from excellent to just utterly brilliant was the thing we’ve all been waiting for: The Face of Boe’s message. Not only that, but The Doctor’s reaction to said message. "You are not alone" booms a dying Face as the Doctor performs the facial equivalent of shouting "WTF, FACE BOY?!".

To cap it all off the episode is topped and tailed with two brilliant scenes referring back to The Doctor's dead home world. The episode opens with a lovely scene involving Martha wanting to visit Gallifrey. The Doctor neglects to tell her it's all blewed up, but for the first time in the new series he actually starts talking about it, describing the “burnt sky” and the citadel encased in a huge dome. It's a lovely moment, and one that is reprised fantastically in the last scene when The Doctor finally comes clean to Martha about its destruction. The episode ends with a spine tingling performance from Tennant as The Doctor continues his previous reverie, echoing words last spoken by Susan in the Hartnell era story the Sensorites. What a way to end an episode and what a way to start what could well be the best arc the New Series, or even Doctor Who as a whole, has ever seen.

Perfection.

5 Stars

About this entry


Comments

You said "the only problem" in two successive sentences, Jono Capps! Good review, though. My favourite bits were -

"YOU BIG...... FACE!"

and the bit where the Doctor went "MACRA." because I thought they weren't coming until ep 10 or so, so I did a great big wee in my pants.

By Michael Lacey
April 20, 2007 @ 11:31 pm

reply / #


The only problem is fixed! Thus I win!

night

By Jonathan Capps
April 21, 2007 @ 12:43 am

reply / #


Fantastic episode. Who cares that everyone and his great aunt knew what the Face's message was going to be or that the Macra were basically (as Russell T Davies states in the commentary) CG tulips, everything was so RIGHT here. It's partly due to the slower pace IMO, most of the best new series episodes (e.g. Dalek, Father's Day, TGITFP, The Impossible Planet) have plenty of breathing space, proving that just because they've only got 45 minutes to play with doesn't mean every one of those minutes has to contain mindless corridor-running, 300mph Tennant speeches, forced gags, fanwank etc.

So, the Doctor is the last of his kind but he is not alone. What will that end up meaning?

By performingmonkey
April 21, 2007 @ 3:08 am

reply / #


SPOILERS

Probably that the Masters back, but he wants to nick off with all of The Doctors regenerations, or something.

By Michael Lacey
April 21, 2007 @ 3:32 am

reply / #


> The only problem is fixed!

Except the first line of the review: "He completely mad!" :-)

Once again I feel like I was watching a different episode to everyone else. While I found a lot to like, I can't see this as more than a three-star ep. The timing on the drama was badly off, though wonderfully played and - in itself - well-written enough. The resolution to the drama was more of that nonsensical 'I'll just play with some wires' gumph. I'll take medical showers over this, frankly.

The Face of Boe's big revelation was cocked-up, as has been said, by the Face describing The Doctor as the last of his kind mere moments before contradicting himself. (Also, why so cryptic? Who wants their last words to be misunderstood? How is it useful to only tell The Doctor about his surviving Time Lord enemy in vague terms?)

Some stuff I didn't care for is forgivable - basically remaking the start of The Long Game to introduce the mood sellers, for example - and it's not like I hated the ep. I just can't rate it higher than 'solid'.

Also - the Face is still a bloody awful animatronic thing. The CGI was only so-so. And the use of the same set over and over REALLY stuck out. Since when does everyone use the same make of vehicle? Even iPods have more than one design. (To be fair, that's the kind of thing you can ignore if the plot has enough twists and turns, but the pro-active storylines had very little verve; all the meat was in back-history and reveation.)

By Andrew
April 21, 2007 @ 11:40 am

reply / #


I agree with some of what you're saying, except I can forgive The Doctor playing with wires given that all he had to do was open a big sunroof.

I don't get how if they were all trapped underground by the virus at the surface, why was it raining at the start? Indoor rain?

By Michael Lacey
April 21, 2007 @ 3:14 pm

reply / #


> by the Face describing The Doctor as the last of his kind mere moments before contradicting himself.

Yeah but this is the thing, the Doctor IS the last of his kind (the last of the Time Lords) but also he is 'not alone'. Tennant said on Confidential that both statements are true and that we'll have to find out what it means later. My guess is that if Saxon really is the Master he isn't a Time Lord anymore. Either that or the Face of Boe considers the Master and the Doctor to be one and the same somehow. Does the throwaway 'brother' comment in 'Smith & Jones' mean something?

By performingmonkey
April 21, 2007 @ 3:33 pm

reply / #


Cappsy. I'm sorry, I'm... you can work out the rest of the controls for yourself.

I *STILL* can't see how this Macra theory warrants such bedwetting enthusiasm. So we're saying it's brilliant because the way in which humankind has been affected is more or less exactly the same as in The Macra Terror only this time without the Macra having to do anything. In that case there's no actual reason it had to be them and just becomes an excuse to appeal to fanboys without actual involving them in the main plot in anyway.

I appreciate now your arguement that he's referencing the original Macra storyline but this again is only course for fanboy excitement and would be lost on the new audience. I realise that for some the fact that RTD is so obviously a fanboy himself and dug out he Macra when it could have been any monster from the pit is something to celebrate but personally I would consider it far clever and worth of acclaim if it'd been worked in, in some way that you wouldn't see coming but when it clicks in to place it had to be the Macra (or whoever)

Still loved all the preperation and the great arc points. I just share Andrew's view that it's nothing more that the story at the core of the episode is nothing more than three star stuff.

Another final thought and again it's just a personal one but I think another problem I have with this story is the way it handles conflict or more specifically the lack of it. There's no villain and everyones so bloody lovely to each other. No cogent enemy other than ignorance, which is fine for 'theory' but meant the central story (forget all the Boe stuff and the Gallifrey stuff which was fucking A) just didn't have much pace. Martha gets kidnaps, oh but the kidnappers are nice. Everyone's stuck in this endless traffic jam, oh but they're all happy and don't really mind. Ah they were locked down there...oh but wait it was to protect them from a virus so it was actually done to save them. Before finally, you are all free to fly away.... Hurrah! Oh but wait no one was really that upset or angry or bothered.

Final finally. Another thought and YOU WILL hate me for this one but please don't because I'm not acually slagging Freema or Martha as I find both actress and character likeable...

BUT

What's the point? In her being there I mean, apart from to give Cappy a big hardon. In the opener (my favourite episode so far) she saves the Doctor's life, gets involved and asks questions which put the Doc on the spot. Great.

It's just occured to me that since then all they've really had the character do is get captured, look pretty, ask the Doctor about something or swoon and then get a bit mopey because he doesn't fancy her. Which seems a bit of a poor return. All fairly standard companiony type things but the setup for Martha in that opener and the whole two worlds collide promo was that this girl was gonna be really kicking bottom and giving The Doctor a run for his money, which *as yet* hasn't really happened. Sure it's early doors. She's still in her first tour of service round the milky way but 4 episodes in to a 13 week run it'd be nice if it wasn't all so nice. As a pair D10/Martha are defintely more watchable then the somewhat cocksure pairing we got 4 eps in to series 2 but she seems to have been a bit underwritten as strong female 'partner' for the Doctor. Hopefully I'm just jumping the gun a bit and as the series progresses so she'll become increasingly essential to the shows dynamic.

By Karl
April 23, 2007 @ 4:16 am

reply / #


I *STILL* can't see how this Macra theory warrants such bedwetting enthusiasm. So we're saying it's brilliant because the way in which humankind has been affected is more or less exactly the same as in The Macra Terror only this time without the Macra having to do anything. In that case there's no actual reason it had to be them and just becomes an excuse to appeal to fanboys without actual involving them in the main plot in anyway.

The thing is, the episode was plotted in a way which a central 'monster' wasn't really required, anyway. We could've had extractor fans accidentally sucking in and killing people on the fast lane, really. There just needed to be some sort of epril down there, cos other than that there was no baddie as such... just a concept.

So, with that, you start to think what 'thing' could you put at the bottom of the motorway that could best service this concept? So, what I assume RTD has done (and, to be honest, my interpretation could be *well* off the mark) is include The Macra as the 'danger', chuck in a line about how they've devolved and then imply that the reason they're devolved is because the human race is now capable of providing their perfect living conditions without them. It's my theory, and I'm sticking to it - even if the themes of the two episode don't match up *exactly*, there's still plenty there to support what I'm saying. Even if you didn't like it all that much...

I appreciate now your arguement that he's referencing the original Macra storyline but this again is only course for fanboy excitement and would be lost on the new audience. I realise that for some the fact that RTD is so obviously a fanboy himself and dug out he Macra when it could have been any monster from the pit is something to celebrate but personally I would consider it far clever and worth of acclaim if it'd been worked in, in some way that you wouldn't see coming but when it clicks in to place it had to be the Macra (or whoever)

But the point I'm making is that the way he integrated the *idea* of The Macra into the episode was just as clever as simply bringing them back and having them doing similar things to what they did in the Macra Terror. And, yes, bringing them back is lost on some of the new fans, but that really isn't the point. They were brought back to excite old fans and keep a vein of continuity from the old series, but in a way that wouldn't alienate or affect new fans who didn't have a clue who they were.

Another final thought and again it's just a personal one but I think another problem I have with this story is the way it handles conflict or more specifically the lack of it. There's no villain and everyones so bloody lovely to each other. No cogent enemy other than ignorance, which is fine for 'theory' but meant the central story (forget all the Boe stuff and the Gallifrey stuff which was fucking A) just didn't have much pace. Martha gets kidnaps, oh but the kidnappers are nice. Everyone's stuck in this endless traffic jam, oh but they're all happy and don't really mind. Ah they were locked down there...oh but wait it was to protect them from a virus so it was actually done to save them. Before finally, you are all free to fly away.... Hurrah! Oh but wait no one was really that upset or angry or bothered.

That's one of the main reason why this episode was brilliant, though! There was no foe, there was no real peril (apart from The Macra a bit later on) and it just gave the episode a nice change in pace. A change away from "oh, so this is this week's baddie" formula.

And the way I saw it, people were happy with the whole situation (or, at least tolerant of it) for two reasons 1) the feeling of community and not being alone. Put a group of people into that situation and a community would spring up, because people will always strive to make the best out of a situation and 2) a lot of them were clearly drugged up to the fucking eyeballs with 'moods'. All you need is a patch of happy and one of optimism and suddenly getting through the day is easy. It's all part of the 'Macra mind control' parallels.

As for Martha, I just plain disagree, and I don't the energy to go into it :P They're still in the early stages, so she's still in the 'sit back, watch and learn' stage, and that's being done brilliantly. once we get to episode 6 I think she'll be much more pro-active. It's called character development...

By Jonathan Capps
April 23, 2007 @ 4:56 pm

reply / #


Once again I feel like I was watching a different episode to everyone else. While I found a lot to like, I can't see this as more than a three-star ep. The timing on the drama was badly off, though wonderfully played and - in itself - well-written enough. The resolution to the drama was more of that nonsensical 'I'll just play with some wires' gumph. I'll take medical showers over this, frankly.

You mean you think showering people with an INTERNAL solution, thus curing them from EVERY ILLNESS IN THE WORLD makes more sense than The Doctor, the technical genius that he is, rewiring a computer to boost the power output so he can open some doors? I mean, I agree it's a simple solution, but at least it's believable and actually consistent with actual logic.

The Face of Boe's big revelation was cocked-up, as has been said, by the Face describing The Doctor as the last of his kind mere moments before contradicting himself. (Also, why so cryptic? Who wants their last words to be misunderstood? How is it useful to only tell The Doctor about his surviving Time Lord enemy in vague terms?)

It's a deliberate contradiction, though. His 'kind' could refer to anything, his race, his mentality, his family... there's on contradiction in there that wasn't deliberate and obviously set up for future clarification.

Also - the Face is still a bloody awful animatronic thing. The CGI was only so-so. And the use of the same set over and over REALLY stuck out. Since when does everyone use the same make of vehicle? Even iPods have more than one design.

What was wrong with Boe and the CGI?

Why is it hard to believe that everyone in the slummish undercity could all own the same, cheap, mass produced vehicle?

(To be fair, that's the kind of thing you can ignore if the plot has enough twists and turns, but the pro-active storylines had very little verve; all the meat was in back-history and reveation.)

Don't you think that the meat of the back-history and revelation was nicely complimented by the less meaty main plot rather than dragged down by it? I don't think we needed anything *really* substantial for the main plot when we've got the Gallifrey/Boe stuff going down, too. Then again, I've made my opinions of the main plot clear, and I think the main plot walked the line between lightweight companion to the Gallifrey/Boe stuff and actually providing a satisfying plot and concept to get your teeth into really well. It was nicely filled with subtle (subtlety, welcome back!) comments on human nature and the ability to self destruct, coupled with some life affirming stuff on communities and the ability to fight through adversity - even if it's adversity that was self created.

Honestly, you're not going to get many single stories as good as this one.

By Jonathan Capps
April 23, 2007 @ 5:11 pm

reply / #


... unless they feature the words "by", "Steven" and "Moffat" in the opening titles... ;-)

By Seb
April 23, 2007 @ 5:46 pm

reply / #


Which is why I said I said "not many" ;)

By Jonathan Capps
April 23, 2007 @ 5:54 pm

reply / #


> It's called character development...

Don't be a patronising bastard darling. It doesn't suit you. I'm perfect aware of character development there just doesn't seem to be much of it going on between episodes 2 and 4. At the moment it's just 'a companion who isn't Rose' and the character stuff has been the Doctor moving on.

Still she'll no doubt be kicking bottom before to long and I admit I'm being a bit over-critical.

By Karl
April 23, 2007 @ 8:19 pm

reply / #


As for all the Macra stuff you've kind of won me over. Well done :P

As for "making a nice change of pace" .... What pace was that then?

Tbh you're right again it's nice to get away from the 'monster of the week' feel but it's still nice to have a bit of peril and that doesn't have to come from an external villain. Just a situation to be faced, figured out and overcome. Sandwiched between the Gallifrey and the Boe stuff what we ended up with was the setup of of the problem - Getting Martha back. The development - The Doctor working how he might do this and then *wham* in comes an external character to collect the Doctor and then another external character (external to the episodes story, rather than the arc story) who provides the energy to open the undercity and as a knock on result re-unite The Doctor and Martha. In effect rendering the scenes where they tried to rescue themselves as a bit redundant.

However! We've debated this back and forth in various places now and I appreciate you replying to each of my issues and supplying passionate justification. The more you explain, the more it feels all the ingredients are right but ultimately, for me, it doesn't add up to the sum of it's parts.

Either way I got to sit next to a doppleganger for Martha today. Thus I win.

By Karl
April 23, 2007 @ 8:38 pm

reply / #


> Either way I got to sit next to a doppleganger for Martha today.

It wasn't Adeola by any chance?

By performingmonkey
April 23, 2007 @ 9:02 pm

reply / #


Ha ha!

No alltough she was a sat at a computer screen and it does potentially involve working up in the city amongst the towers.

By Karl
April 23, 2007 @ 9:28 pm

reply / #


> You mean you think showering people with an INTERNAL solution, thus curing them from EVERY ILLNESS IN THE WORLD makes more sense than The Doctor, the technical genius that he is, rewiring a computer to boost the power output so he can open some doors? I mean, I agree it's a simple solution, but at least it's believable and actually consistent with actual logic.

Big deal, if it has no impact. Where's the climactic value in Superman, at the end of a big story, pushing a lever that was a bit too stiff for everyone else? Just because it fits his character's ability, doesn't give it oomph.

For me it's just the difference between a climax that has a thematic and poetic resonance, and one that just serves the need to conclude the story.

Scientific logic isn't the governing principal of Who anyway - the time travel flat out doesn't work, week by week, it's just a device to bounce around - and that's fine. It respects locical thinking, but isn't retricted by it. The logic of the medication was flawed, but it WAS inventive and smartly built into the story.

Better, anyway, than creating a switch that nobody could figure how to flick, just so he could flick it. It's as slavish to the structure as that nonsensical "only enough power for one teleport" tosh.

Now, say the Doc came up with a way to, I dunno, utilise the built up fumes to blow the lid off the city. Now that has some poetry to it.

> It's a deliberate contradiction, though. His 'kind' could refer to anything, his race, his mentality, his family... there's on contradiction in there that wasn't deliberate and obviously set up for future clarification."

Oh. I thought it meant the Master was coming back, but was just dragging out the ambiguity for the audience.

> What was wrong with Boe and the CGI?

Um...seriously? CGI was so-so - not awesome, not awful - but the Face? Come on. I know you love the ep, but it's always been a pretty unexpressive, plastic-looking. ("Oh, but that's DELIBERATE!" etc.)

> Why is it hard to believe that everyone in the slummish undercity could all own the same, cheap, mass produced vehicle?

Because people in slummish areas don't, do they? It doesn't happen that way.

But, as I say, if the story beats had kicked in for me, I wouldn't have cared.

> Don't you think that the meat of the back-history and revelation was nicely complimented by the less meaty main plot rather than dragged down by it?

Yes. That's why I posted my opinion agreeing with your five-star review.

Oh, no, wait, that wasn't it at all. No, I found the lack of progression frustrating, and not compensated by attempts to showboat with the drop down the lanes. I don't need big set-pieces, I just want the narrative to satisfy. And I wasn't satisfied.

The Girl in The Fireplace made an art of discovery - uncovering the true situation while also probing the characters. This wasn't art, just a decent paint-by-numbers.

> Honestly, you're not going to get many single stories as good as this one.

FACT, there. :-)

I happen to think we've had much better before, and will have again. Thus was the nature of taste defined.

By Andrew
April 24, 2007 @ 12:16 am

reply / #


> it feels all the ingredients are right but ultimately, for me, it doesn't add up to the sum of it's parts.

Yeah, what he said.

By Andrew
April 24, 2007 @ 12:19 am

reply / #


I wish people would stop masturbating over The Girl In The Fireplace (can you imagine saying that out loud in front of someone who didn't know the show?). Just because it was the only good episode in series 2, apart from The Impossible Planet, it's not the be all and end all of everything. Though it does stand out amongst the total dross of the Cyber 2-parter and the weak-but-deluded-fans-like-it-because-Sarah-Jane's-in-it School Reunion. And it's like the third occasion where a good story actually fit into the 45 minute standalone format (Dalek and Father's Day are the others). Oh fuck it, it's DEFINITELY worth masturbating over. Well...Sophia Myles is. New Who has such a great track record for total babes)

By performingmonkey
April 24, 2007 @ 1:52 pm

reply / #


So, to conclude, you completely disagree with yourself?

By Jonathan Capps
April 24, 2007 @ 2:36 pm

reply / #


Well, in my own defense, there were specific points of correspondence between the two eps that I was trying to talk about. But, also, it's easier to say 'this ep did it better' in a debate when it's an ep you know both sides basically agree on!

By Andrew
April 24, 2007 @ 4:22 pm

reply / #


I wish people would stop masturbating over The Girl In The Fireplace

Tough. It's a fucking genius forty-five minutes of television, and I'll FIGHT anyone who says otherwise.

By Seb
April 24, 2007 @ 5:42 pm

reply / #


TGITFP is the best episode of New Who yet, and probably my favourite thing to have been broadcast on telly in the last ten years. Also, I like the Face Of Boe. I think it looks dead good. I don't really see how they could have made a character which consists of A BIG FACE any better.

By Michael Lacey
April 24, 2007 @ 7:12 pm

reply / #


They could have attached some big dreadlocks to the top of it's jar.

By Karl
April 24, 2007 @ 9:37 pm

reply / #


> probably my favourite thing to have been broadcast on telly in the last ten years.

Quite a bold statement. Granted, I thought this about 'Rose' when it was first broadcast (or rather when I viewed the 'leak' online) and look at what greatness followed it. What made me love the first episode of new Who so much was that I had zero expectations of the series and, despite Eccleston being ol' no. 9, I thought that Billie being in it as a 'chav' off an estate was a REAL warning sign. So I couldn't believe how blown away I was by 'Rose' and how I was suddenly insanely excited at the prospect of the rest of the series.

The best moment ever is still the end of 'Bad Wolf' with Eccleston and the Daleks 'and doesn't that scare you to death'. And they won't ever beat it while they've got crap like the human Dalek hybrid ending an episode like a damp squib. Tennant facing off against Simm is the best bet they've got.

By performingmonkey
April 24, 2007 @ 11:03 pm

reply / #


Well, Gridlock was the best standalone RTD-written ep for me (with the exception of Rose). I'd need to watch it again before I could answer many of the complaints against it, but to me it just had a magic that a lot of Series 2 eps lacked. I felt vaguely disappointed after watching Tooth & Claw, for instance - but not so here.

And I think the final scene of the episode is my favourite performance of Tennant as The Doctor.

On the minus side, I think a lot of the CGI was pretty ropey - I've kind of got used to the fact that New Who seems to want to do too many FX shots for their budget, but I wish they'd just do less shots but better. I don't care about the cars all looking the same, though - my brain just automatically adjusts expectations for the budget they're on. A film, it would be dodgy... but I can accept that Who is going to have limitations in this area.

I'm just a lot less forgiving of bad CGI than of a limited production design budget...

By John Hoare
April 25, 2007 @ 1:25 am

reply / #


Actually, I'll tell you why I think I loved this episode. It's because I think RTD got the emotional beats right, he got the humour right, and he got the dialogue right. So many times in RTD scripts, there's dodgy stuff - bad dialogue ("I think you need a Doctor!!!!!!111"), or misjudged jokes (the "We are not amused" stuff in Tooth & Claw doesn't hold up well for me), or a badly-judged character moment (Rose's "I want chips" at the end of The End of the World, which I find excruciating).

Here, all the important stuff for me worked. There may well have been shitloads of dodgy plotting - but I'm just not sensitive to that. I'm more interested in the other stuff - and for me, it delivered it in spades.

By John Hoare
April 25, 2007 @ 7:45 am

reply / #


I totally agree, John. Practically every episode of S1 & 2 has had at least one moment that made me completely wince - even TGITFP ("I COULD HAVE DAAAANCED ALL NIGHT!" although that moment is saved a bit by Rose going "oh, look what the cat dragged in, the oncoming storm..."). For Who to have finally got rid of these absolutely queer moments is fantastic and I'm more than willing to forgive the more minor structural flaws. Although I don't think Gridlock had too many of them really, I'm more thinking about Daleks Take Manhattan.

By Michael Lacey
April 25, 2007 @ 5:16 pm

reply / #


> (Rose's "I want chips" at the end of The End of the World, which I find excruciating).

But that's such an effective moment because it brings everything back down to Earth. Although Russell did have a bit of an obsession with chips in series 1, it has to be said 'all you lot do is go to work, eat chips and go to bed, while all round you there's a war going on' and Rose harks back to that in TPOTW.

By performingmonkey
April 25, 2007 @ 8:49 pm

reply / #


To be fair to RTD, it's partly Piper's performance I find so mind-splittingly awful in that scene. It's one of the few false notes she's ever given in her performance. She just comes across as really, really annoying.

But I think the dialogue is clunky too. As an idea, it's fine, for the reasons you suggest - but the execution is lacking, for me.

By John Hoare
April 25, 2007 @ 8:52 pm

reply / #


"The End Of The World" is the actual real worst ever episode of New Who, as anyone knows.

By Michael Lacey
April 25, 2007 @ 9:25 pm

reply / #


Na, Love & Monsters.

By Karl
April 25, 2007 @ 10:50 pm

reply / #


Surely "Boom Town" - the restaurant stuff is quite good but the rest of it is rubbish and the ending is pretty terrible. "Bad Wolf" would easily be in with a shot since it's fucking dreadful right up until Rose gets zapped when it suddenly gets really good which disqualifies it.

By Zagrebo
April 25, 2007 @ 10:52 pm

reply / #


No, it's "New Earth".

Karl, I'm disappointed to find you siding with Charlie Brooker on the Only Thing He's Ever Been Wrong About. "Love & Monsters" is a brilliant, brilliant piece of telly.

By Seb
April 25, 2007 @ 11:05 pm

reply / #


Ha ha. Tbh I haven't got a worst. I just said L&M to get Cappsy to gag (oooh pardon) when he reads this.

By Karl
April 25, 2007 @ 11:28 pm

reply / #


The Long Game. Yes, that's right, I said The Long Game. Even Pegg couldn't save it.

By Andrew
April 26, 2007 @ 12:55 am

reply / #


See, if it wasn't for Pegg, I'd probably say that one myself - but for me, he does just about save it.

By Seb
April 26, 2007 @ 10:27 am

reply / #


For me, there hasn't been a truly terrible episode yet. Even stuff like The Long Game and Fear Her have their merits. It's all relative.

By John Hoare
April 26, 2007 @ 10:34 am

reply / #


> For me, there hasn't been a truly terrible episode yet.

I would agree with this, too. 'Worst episode' is most definitely a relative term.

By Andrew
April 26, 2007 @ 10:55 am

reply / #


Fear Her is the only episode I've not rewatched since broadcast. And this is coming from someone who usually watches an episode 2 or 3 times before the next week! It really struck a nerve with me, and I don't think any other episode has come even close to being that bad.

By Jonathan Capps
April 26, 2007 @ 10:59 am

reply / #


> Fear Her

Worth it for the jar or marmalade moment alone, frankly.

That and, actually, much of the dialogue in the first 15 minutes.

By Andrew
April 26, 2007 @ 2:42 pm

reply / #


I don't think Fear Her is that bad, really. Mainly because I appreciated what they were trying to do with it, didn't have a problem with any of the overblown Olympic torch stuff, and liked some of the jokes. (You can't beat the TARDIS gag at the start, for instance.)

But I think (for once) I hit the nail on the head in my review, where I said that it's quite a feat that they made an episode that's essentially about child abuse slightly boring.

By John Hoare
April 26, 2007 @ 3:00 pm

reply / #


For me it's a toss-up between Fear Her, The Long Game, New Earth and The Idiot's Lantern. OK forget New Earth, it's the best of the three for a number of reasons, one being the Face of Boe, another being Billie and her sheer hotness. I know a lot of people like it but The Idiot's Lantern does my fucking head in and I'd be willing to say it's the episode I enjoyed the least on broadcast. At least Fear Her has the excuse that it was a budget-saving episode.

By performingmonkey
April 26, 2007 @ 8:45 pm

reply / #


The Long Game, New Earth, Fear Her and Idiots Lantern all have plenty of saving graces, despite being overall disappointments. I hate literally EVERY FRAME of The End Of The World, and it's by far Ecclestons most offensive performance *ever*. And the amount of budget wasted on a fucking two minute scene where a parade of latex wankers exchange "gifts" and The Doctor does that STUPID FUCKING FACE AND DANCE to FUCKING BRITNEY FUCKING SPEARS and AAAAAAAAARGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH IT'S SO SHIT

By Michael Lacey
April 27, 2007 @ 5:42 pm

reply / #


> I hate literally EVERY FRAME of The End Of The World

Therefore your opinion on anything else means nothing. Oh, and I think it's 'Tainted Love' which Eccleston does the stupid moves to.

By performingmonkey
April 27, 2007 @ 6:49 pm

reply / #


Before you all start crying like stupid children, we are planning on catching up with these pretty soon. I've been tasked with a double review of the Dalek story and Seb will be along after that with the Lazarus review. Since we've got an extra week to play with, though, thing will be a little spread out over the next few weeks. We should be back on a decent schedule from 42 onwards, though.

By Jonathan Capps
May 07, 2007 @ 6:05 pm

reply / #


"Therefore your opinion on anything else means nothing."

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTT.

If that's the way we're playing, the fact that you like TEOTW means all of your opinions are ACTUALLY GAY and you have AIDS.

By Michael Lacey
May 07, 2007 @ 8:00 pm

reply / #


I should hope so too, John. Also, is there a ETA on the Life on Mars? post-mortem? I've been vaguely looking forward to a bit of NTS treatment there.

By Rosti
May 07, 2007 @ 8:41 pm

reply / #


Shit, yeah, I took on responsibility for that and never got round to it. Let me put that on the "to do" list - if I know there's demand for it, it might make me more likely to get to it ;-)

By Seb
May 07, 2007 @ 10:45 pm

reply / #


Yes, Seb. Do that. Quick!

By Michael Lacey
May 08, 2007 @ 2:18 am

reply / #